Thread: b18c1 hatch
View Single Post
Old Jun 16, 2002 | 10:14 AM
  #15 (permalink)  
Sleeping_92_SI's Avatar
Sleeping_92_SI
I kill 32-bit ECUs
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by "chethewitt"

you're right, i shouldn't respond but it makes me wonder why some people say the things they do when it sounds like they've never successfully turned a wrench before.

sorry, won't say anything else.


to get back on topic, i'd suggest going all motor. if this is a daily driven vehicle then reliability has to be a serious consideration. and, with turbo, there will always be reliability issues even if the entire motor is built properly. ask anyone on this board and they'll tell you that their turbocharged car requires constant attention.

if this is the case, that in fact its a daily driver, then getting more aggressive cams, advancing the timing, even going with a better drivetrain is a better investment and a smarter overall move. no, the high horsepower numbers won't be there, but the engine should make good enough power to get into the mid-low 13's. afterall, any hatchback (thats not an si weighing in at 2300+lbs) with 180+hp to the wheels will be into the 13's with a good driver and good tires. and as many dyno tests have shown 180+hp to the wheels in an all motor b18c is well within reach.
mines an si i'm running mid 13's ?? i think it only weights 2260.
i have to look on my title. i'de sacerfice 160 pounds fr a/c / powersteering / cruise / sunroof ect.
this is my daily driver got to make it comfortable.
thats why i went jdm to make up for the extra 160 someodd pounds.
Anthony
__________________
Drunmann Tuning's Scoob: 2.55 liter-6spd swapped Bugeye, fully built w/280 cams and a rotated Precision-6266
DD: 2010 MazdaSpeed3: Fully bolted and tuned
Drift Missile: S13 DOHC swap, welded diff = slidetastic
Bicycle: Kawi 636R.

Reply