Originally Posted by Quickdomesticracer
quickdomesticricer? WRONG. How am I wrong when I asked Leonard at gearhead and he read HOOKER SHORTYS 28 RWHP from the book, and many people tell me that the LT1 have 285 RWHP? Arent I correct in saying RICERS are for looks and not performance, when my dad owns 3 race cars, that I help work on and tune on? 2 Camaros and 1 S 10 blazer? I dont think Performance Catologs that supply Gearhead will be guessing, or innaccurate, just cause I havent ran a dyno on mine, added headers and did another dyno doesnt mean its wrong, They cant put false information, all that info is tested, yes its printed to sound the best, and I am sure some only get 15+ HP gains, but its not completely wrong.
You also see well
285
+28
K & N Cold Air
Blocking off the TB from the water system +5 or 6 HP
CSI Electric water pump +5 I mean u can get over 425 Engine HP from bolt ons, your telling me that more than 75 HP is lost to the Rear wheels?
I CAN ALSO TELL YOU SOME PEOPLE HERE ARE FULL OF SHIT. THEY GOT 1.38 60ft oing 6.98 in the 1/8th at 103? My dad had 2 different race cars, one that ran 6.40s but before the engine upgrade was running 6.90s with 1.47 60fts and so, and his new car which runs 6.90s which gets 1.49-1.56 60fts, if u got 1.38 unless u let off is unrealistic.
you wont get 28rwhp from shorty's unless you have a blower setup, or very very very aggressive heads/cam...you sure as shit wont get anywhere near it on a stock motor. and why does someone have to be full of shit saying they cut a 1.38 and X.XX time? just cause your dad couldnt do it doesnt make him the end all be all of launchers. i cut low 1.7's and went 8.9/13.9, so there goes your theory on that.
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...
