Originally posted by bitemark46
That's great that you work for an insurance company but I would respectfully disagree. When I bought my cobra new in 1998 I was 23yrs old. I went to my insurance company to start a new plan so to speak. My agent got my info and went into his pc to see what my current company would charge on my new car. He said they would not cover me under than car. So I had to go with another company with a higher premium. Now I'm pretty sure if I drove an integra, civic, accord, etc. that they would have covered it.
Would you agree with this analogy?
If 100 single males under 25 all get a rwd v8 that makes we'll say 320hp that their insurance will be less than if they were to purchase a 120-160hp fwd 4 cyl?
You tell me which of the two is going to have more claims? I know that if it's easier to steal at civic, accord, integra that insurance companies will take that into consideration but compare how many thefts there are to compared to how many accidents there are per day. -Mark
dude hes right... the insurace on the civics and stuff IS more expencive.. when i was car shopping me and my parents put together a list of 10 cars to take into the insurance company and get quotes on. i had the civic, integra, mustang gt and a few other cars on there.. the reason im driving a mustang right now is because it had the lowest cost on insurance. as he said, with liability it is cheaper, but not full coverage.. we priced with several insurance companys by the way.