My opinion on why a Supercharger is inferior to a Turbocharger
This is a spin off from another thread, and these are simply my uneducated underachiever's opinions, nothing more.
Firstly we have our standard supercharger.
Pros - no wait for boost (depending on model) decent power, and relativly unevasive install, roughly 6 hours.
Cons - upgradability is limited... sure you can get a smaller pulley, but doing so causes more heat along with the added pressure. Expensive. Very expensive intercooling. Lots of low end torque isn't always the best thing for a fwd car.
Here we have our standard turbocharger.
Pros - Extreemly upgradable. Inexpensive compared to a S/C. Cheap and effective intercooling. Ability to make lots of horsepower. Also, not too complex and longwinded installation.
Cons - LAG. Rebuilds. Can be unpredictable at times, especially an old turbo. More parts to deal with.
Why would I choose a turbo over an intercooled SC?
Because they can make more power.
Last edited by Cronic; Jun 1, 2004 at 02:31 AM.