GM Tech - Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, Hummer, Pontiac, Saturn Tech Technical Discussion for General Motors Products both past and present

Why are LT1's such crap?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 9, 2005 | 06:14 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
EliteZ's Avatar
Precision Motorsports
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Default

I wouldnt say that in comparing LS1 to LT1. I dont know alot about LS1s b/c I dont own one. but I know LT blocks are 2 or 4 bolt, and I am pretty sure LSx's are always or maybe mostly 6 bolt mains. They have higher Compressions motors, better flowing Heads/Intake/TB. LT1's arent crap. I was gonna say the shortblock is good, but if its a 2 bolt main, least you can say is that its a 350.
__________________
448WHP/420WTQ
Full bolt-ons+H/C
Car Sound Clip & More(W/ Mekanic)
Tuned by Precision Motorsports
Old May 9, 2005 | 07:25 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
ZDriver96's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Default

thats not fair corey.. Your 4L60E LS1 tranny has broken or started to break more than once.
They are just 12-8 year old cars that people throw power at and break.
__________________

96 M6 Arctic White Z28
"SLOW LT1"
Blue 2005 Acura TSX
Old May 9, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
s10_male's Avatar
s10_male
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
mine fixed it's self so my LT1 isn't so bad

just scott and phinger's
For now get it a week lol
__________________
Old May 9, 2005 | 09:53 PM
  #14 (permalink)  
formula69's Avatar
blowed up
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
Default

yeah 9 times out of 10 mine fixes itself, i think i just need to change the oil to fix this problem... in all honesty i love my lt1 and it gives me relatively no problems.. us lt1 owners just blow the average problems we have out of proportion unlike other car make/model owners i guess we are just cry babies
__________________

Originally Posted by 05general lee
im FAT!!!!
Originally Posted by Little Nicky
Scott is my body guard
T.R. $100,000 kill club member #002
Turtle crew member #2
Old May 10, 2005 | 12:43 AM
  #15 (permalink)  
formula69's Avatar
blowed up
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
Default

in all honesty the lt1 is simply a cheap mans ls1.. i know a lot of us cant afford payments on an ls1 or cant afford to just buy one strait up, my lt1 was cheap and in perfect condition and bone stock. right now i dont even have 10k invested in the car including the 7k i paid for it and it will keep up with the best of the bolt on ls1's. im not saying i can take down any serious ls1 because shit im still on my stock cam and shortblock with just some freshened up stock flowing heads... but the car holds its own. the reason there arent a lot of faster lt1s running around is because the owners dont have the cash to mod them (its the POOR mans ls1) or they dont know enough about the cars to mod them correctly. The lt1s have very inferior heads and a smaller cam than the ls1, they also have a shittier intake/tb setup, but thats not all.. the lt1 computer is a HUGE source of power. with just the right simple bolt ons, a good dyno tune can put an lt1 way up there. the other slow points are the fuel and ignition, and just to clear it up, most opti failures are owner related, i dont like the thing either, but if we are just more careful they wont break as easily. i have a HUGE ignition problem right now because i dont produce enough spark to run my setup.. cant rev as high as i should which means not reaching potential. lt1 owners throw a bunch of bolt ons at their car ( LT headers, intake, exhaust etc) and are still under 300 hp.. with a good dyno tune those mods alone can get you up and over 300, maybe not too far but you dont have to be stuck at like 290. the lt1 is just old technology. make it new and you can have a fast, cheap hotrod thatll hang right up there with the ls1 guys for less money
__________________

Originally Posted by 05general lee
im FAT!!!!
Originally Posted by Little Nicky
Scott is my body guard
T.R. $100,000 kill club member #002
Turtle crew member #2
Old May 10, 2005 | 06:06 AM
  #16 (permalink)  
myltwon's Avatar
Bolt-On 2v GT
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,713
Likes: 0
Default

actually last I heard big rick was getting ready to beat the best LS1 time in his turbo LT1
__________________


"Does this look like a piece of crap to you? Like them spinnin' tires do you?"
Old May 10, 2005 | 06:18 AM
  #17 (permalink)  
gator's Avatar
Underdog
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Default

ls1 403" motor has the speed record.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am

Originally Posted by 1Bad00SS
What makes you think you could of keep up with me. Have you ever had that car on a dyno?
Old May 10, 2005 | 06:40 AM
  #18 (permalink)  
Young,Fablous,&Broke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,202
Likes: 0
Default

Problems just becuase they are older?

Well Ford's 5.0 is even older than the LT1 and i dont read about these issues in the Ford forums?
Old May 10, 2005 | 06:58 AM
  #19 (permalink)  
myltwon's Avatar
Bolt-On 2v GT
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,713
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by corey r.
Problems just becuase they are older?

Well Ford's 5.0 is even older than the LT1 and i dont read about these issues in the Ford forums?
that's because the 5.0 was just a basic, tried-and-true formula motor

the LT1 was an experimental motor, trying out a bunch of new ideas, the LS1 is the end result.

oh and to say 5.0's are not problematic, I beg to differ, some people who
shall remain unnamed, go through headgaskets quicker than a MKIII supra
__________________


"Does this look like a piece of crap to you? Like them spinnin' tires do you?"
Old May 10, 2005 | 08:36 AM
  #20 (permalink)  
s10_male's Avatar
s10_male
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
oh and to say 5.0's are not problematic, I beg to differ, some people who
shall remain unnamed, go through headgaskets quicker than a MKIII supra

LOL
__________________



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:10 PM.