General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

Pics of Stance you hate/love! And why!?

Thread Tools
 
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
edmel89's Avatar
Thread Starter
That One Guy
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,542
Likes: 0
Wink Pics of Stance you hate/love! And why!?

AKA

Our Stance VS. Their Stance (Cause thats pretty much what its all about.)

BKA

Talk about cars with more money invested in them, then you have in your house.

If you came in this thread to just be lame and look at photos, then hit the road. If your awesome and came to post your view, read others view, and argue, then this is the place for you. Lets have some fun and post pics of stance you like, dont like, whatever, and why? It doesn't matter what style it maybe, post one you like, or don't like, and why. Lets debate, argue, laugh, and agree. At least have the courtesy to post educated comments. If you feel like quoting someone elses pics and saying how you agree, or don't agree, then by all means, post. Lets all try and be grown up, but for the cry babys, learn to take a joke.

__________________________________________________ ____________

Me first, these few are great examples of the kinda stance I like.


























These next few... not so much....





Even though this corolla looks ok, wheel style doesnt flow, and I hate FWDs with staggared sets like this. Plus the wheels are to big for the car, and tires slightly too small. And can't forget the stickers...




Altough the white BBS's look so good on that color; alot of what I said about the Toyota can be said about this VW.


I would post pics of those VIP styles with wheels that have crazy camber and tuck... But some are on air, which is proper for driving everday I imagine, so I'll let someone post one that they know isnt on air, or on air?

Enjoy TRama
__________________
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Thatguysstuff's Avatar
Hey its that guy!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,751
Likes: 0
Default

I personally do not like the hella flush stance... I like a usable car... you know to load stuff and people into and go..

But for a show car I think they look good.. But I would never have one..
__________________
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
_Charles_'s Avatar
formerly 'RiceRocket'
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,691
Likes: 0
Default

What I do like:


What I don't like:


Next...

sipping some Haterade, popping the corn, and waiting for the haters to be hating.
__________________


1953 Cadillac Coupe De Ville (Fuel Injected, Drive-by-wire, DoD)
2009 Pontiac G8 GT (6.0l V8 Sleeper)
2011 Toyota Sequoia Sport 4x4 (Tow Rig)
My Blog: www.HotRodCaddy.com
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:23 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
G-Magoo's Avatar
July - Ride of the Month
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
Default

^hahahahaha
__________________
I love haters..
Originally Posted by VR6exxy
I love your brutal honesty. It makes my day
Build thread
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
edmel89's Avatar
Thread Starter
That One Guy
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,542
Likes: 0
Default

lol
__________________
Old May 20, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
S60R's Avatar
5 Cylinders Of Fury
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Default

I'd like the benz better if someone were to clean up the bad camber and the poke that its making up for in the rear. Otherwise its a pretty bad ass looking euro-muscle car.

Like the subaru too, but too much tire stretch in the rear once again making up for the poke that should be resolved with the correct suspension work or offset adjustments.

The bug appears to be perfect, but the miata is also using too much camber to look flush and make up for the fucked up wheel offset.

I agree with ya about putting the big wheels where you need them when it comes to stagger.

That's about it with my criticisms. Its a shame too, cause a lot of the cars in the F&S thread and here would look awesome if a lot of them didn't really screw the pooch on getting the flush and dropped look right. Makes it look more like a botched job than any kind of cool trend when I see that kinda thing.

My view on being both functional and looking good is no poking out, flush is the ideal. If you can't manage to tuck your wheels in the stock fenders, put some bigger fenders or flares on. No car should have more than a couple degrees of camber for both functional reasons and aesthetic ones.
__________________
2004 S60R - 350+ HP, AWD, Custom FMIC & Exhaust, Active Suspension & A Big Set Of Brembos


Crazy Camber, Stretch & Poke; its the new triple-stack-bleacher-wing ricer fad that's all the rage nowadays, lol
Old May 20, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
medicmatt's Avatar
my mojo so dope
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Default

another classic example of a stupid pointless thread by OP

why start a thread with the intentions of starting an argument?
__________________

Old May 20, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #8 (permalink)  
CoRDiTe's Avatar
Not Mad
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,411
Likes: 0
Default

This thread is fucking retarded. We already have two other threads about this fucking bull shit.

On top of that it has the same fucking pictures as the other two threads.
__________________
Old May 20, 2010 | 02:55 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
edmel89's Avatar
Thread Starter
That One Guy
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,542
Likes: 0
Default

99.999999% Positive the point of this thread is to give everyone a place to debate, argue, and laugh at all the different kinds of styles within fitment and stance. This might help keep the other original thread comment free, and only with pics, like they said they wanted.
__________________
Old May 20, 2010 | 03:01 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
P057's Avatar
isuck
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by edmel89
99.999999% Positive the point of this thread is to give everyone a place to debate, argue, and laugh at all the different kinds of styles within fitment and stance. This might help keep the other original thread comment free, and only with pics, like they said they wanted.
there's no debating on TR. just arguing and then posting stupid photos copied from 4chan that were copied from SA forums 5-times over.

This was a thread to start people arguing. And i agree, there are already two other threads on this subject matter, one more is not necessary.
__________________
Originally Posted by BigBadBuick
Originally Posted by TNathe
so because wikileaks doesnt have it means it didnt happen? Now there's some logic!
LOGIC? You seriously want to invoke logic in a conversation about fake hijackings, missiles hitting the pentagon, and bombs planted throughout the world trade center? I thought it was a given that logic was checked at the door when entering one of these threads.




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:20 PM.