Defense Law passed?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Defense Law passed?
Was getting bits and pieces of this from several threads and wanted to know if anyone can completely clarify it for me... apparently Jeb bush passed a new law for self defense... I dont wanna make any assumptions on it , because i have heard several conflicting pieces of the law... i read about it in a bike theft thread as far as defending property and ect... any info would be great....thanks....
Quimsickle
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
I think this is what your talking about
Ch. 2005-27 (C.S. for C.S. for S.B. 436) Authorizes the use of force, including deadly force, against an intruder or attacker in a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle under specified circumstances; provides exceptions; conforms specified provisions. Provides immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force. Effective October 1, 2005.
Ch. 2005-27 (C.S. for C.S. for S.B. 436) Authorizes the use of force, including deadly force, against an intruder or attacker in a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle under specified circumstances; provides exceptions; conforms specified provisions. Provides immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force. Effective October 1, 2005.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
yep , that would be the one , and you gave me what i needed.. thanks Holmes , appreciate it...so on to my more elaborate qustion , what kinda provisions and exceptions is it implying about...
I'm Bored
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,472
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bholmes
I think this is what your talking about
Ch. 2005-27 (C.S. for C.S. for S.B. 436) Authorizes the use of force, including deadly force, against an intruder or attacker in a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle under specified circumstances; provides exceptions; conforms specified provisions. Provides immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force. Effective October 1, 2005.
Ch. 2005-27 (C.S. for C.S. for S.B. 436) Authorizes the use of force, including deadly force, against an intruder or attacker in a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle under specified circumstances; provides exceptions; conforms specified provisions. Provides immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force. Effective October 1, 2005.
meet force with force
__________________
F.D.S. inc.
coming to a corner near you
F.D.S. inc.
coming to a corner near you
Originally Posted by Residente-Calle13
PUÑETA CABRONES FEDERALES HIJOS DE LA PUTA MADRE Q LOS PARIO USTEDES
SON UNA ENFERMEDAD NISIQUIERA MERECEN SER LLAMADOS HUMANOS SON UNAS
MISERABLES CUCARACHAR Q NO SABEN Q CARAJO ACER CON SU PUTA VIDA.. YO
LES TENGO UN CONSEJO... AMARENSE UNA SOGA A LAS BOLAS Y TIRENSE DE UN
PUENTE CABRONES
SON UNA ENFERMEDAD NISIQUIERA MERECEN SER LLAMADOS HUMANOS SON UNAS
MISERABLES CUCARACHAR Q NO SABEN Q CARAJO ACER CON SU PUTA VIDA.. YO
LES TENGO UN CONSEJO... AMARENSE UNA SOGA A LAS BOLAS Y TIRENSE DE UN
PUENTE CABRONES
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
I think they have to actually threaten you still. The main difference between this and the old law is you dont have to be cornered or anything. The old law stated if you could run, do it. This one says blast away.
I dont think you can shoot them in the back however. Still a non no
I dont think you can shoot them in the back however. Still a non no
__________________
"so persuasively did they talk; and yet there is hardly a word of truth in what they have said."
Plato, Apology
"On life's journey faith is nourishment, virtuous deeds are a shelter, wisdom is the light by day and right mindfulness is the protection by night. If a man lives a pure life, nothing can destroy him."
Buddha
"so persuasively did they talk; and yet there is hardly a word of truth in what they have said."
Plato, Apology
"On life's journey faith is nourishment, virtuous deeds are a shelter, wisdom is the light by day and right mindfulness is the protection by night. If a man lives a pure life, nothing can destroy him."
Buddha
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,565
Likes: 0
If someone is stealing your bike or car YOU MAY NOT use force to protect PROPERTY. ONLY LIFE. If you are in it or on it while they are trying to steal it and "feel your life is threatened" then you may use deadly force.
Also a mis-conception. If I am confronted by a gunman who has killed a person, I draw my weapon, he runs. I can shoot him dead in the back w/o worrying about reprocussions because i have REASONABLE INFO THAT HE MAY SHOOT SOMEONE ELSE (after all he just did), and I am protected under the law to defend my life as well as those around me.
AGAIN, you MAY NOT use deadly force to defend property unless you are in it and feel threatened.
I dont think you can shoot them in the back however. Still a non no
AGAIN, you MAY NOT use deadly force to defend property unless you are in it and feel threatened.
__________________
gone fishin
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
It's always better to be judged by 12, rather that carried by 6.
__________________
http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org
http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org
One of the consequences of such notions as "entitlements" is that people who have contributed nothing to society feel that society owes them something, apparently just for being nice enough to grace us with their presence.”
Thomas Sowell (American Writer and Economist, b.1930)
Thomas Sowell (American Writer and Economist, b.1930)
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,565
Likes: 0
ahaha, i was watching "Reposessions" on Discovery and in Texas if its after dark you can presume someone walking through your front yard is a burgler and open fire at the person. makes reposessing a vehicle a lil tricky at night.
makes reposessing a vehicle a lil tricky at night.
__________________
