Vid* F360 vs 911Turbo vs M3 CSL vs Murcielago vs Gallardo vs NSX-R
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vid* F360 vs 911Turbo vs M3 CSL vs Murcielago vs Gallardo vs NSX-R
Escort Connoisseur
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it overheated 
__________________
"Genuine" ASE certified Mazda, Hyundai, Isuzu Technician
Escort Enthusiast Site
Automotive Electrical Specialist, Tuning Specialist
"Genuine" ASE certified Mazda, Hyundai, Isuzu Technician
Escort Enthusiast Site
Automotive Electrical Specialist, Tuning Specialist
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got that last month... Great vid... still though for an overheated engine it still made third and held first for almost two laps.... Great car driven at its full potential. IMO the other drivers didn't push those cars.... Big difference in laptimes....
__________________
SIMON
14.359@96MPH
All Stock
SIMON
14.359@96MPH
All Stock
7M 2JZ bird in pear tree
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm confused how a company can have a smaller engine in it's most expencive supercar and have an even bigger engine in its minivan...
__________________
ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Orion ZyGarian
I'm confused how a company can have a smaller engine in it's most expencive supercar and have an even bigger engine in its minivan...
I'm confused how a company can have a smaller engine in it's most expencive supercar and have an even bigger engine in its minivan...
Porno Music Producer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,000,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the lambos were definitely much faster cars than the nsx if you're talking one lap ability. both have AWD and a LOT more horsepower. the driver of the murcielago was saving the tires and brakes for the last lap and it paid off. even if the nsx hadn't overheated it could not have won (maybe could have got 2nd).
still though, for the money, definitely a great car.
still though, for the money, definitely a great car.
__________________
and thinks it's really funny when her nose goes bloody
'cause the blow is so yummy and it keeps her tummy empty
and makes her act more friendly
and thinks it's really funny when her nose goes bloody
'cause the blow is so yummy and it keeps her tummy empty
and makes her act more friendly
E & I Certified
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah the Odessy and MDX are 3.5L, but SOHC. The NSX-R is 3.2L DOHC. The NSX engine is also lighter.
$60K + buys you double the horsepower in the Lambos. Personally, if i could afford any of them, I'd take the NSX, get Cybernation turbo kit (480whp stock internals) and laugh my way to the bank.
You can't deny that for half the horsepower and at a lower cost, the NSX hung pretty damned good.
An NSX here (non R) with every accessory is $90K.
An R in Japan would probably be $100K
3.2L V6 VTEC 280bhp
Murcielago $193-280K
6.1L V12 580bhp
Gallardo $165K
4.9L V10 500bhp
$60K + buys you double the horsepower in the Lambos. Personally, if i could afford any of them, I'd take the NSX, get Cybernation turbo kit (480whp stock internals) and laugh my way to the bank.
You can't deny that for half the horsepower and at a lower cost, the NSX hung pretty damned good.
An NSX here (non R) with every accessory is $90K.
An R in Japan would probably be $100K
3.2L V6 VTEC 280bhp
Murcielago $193-280K
6.1L V12 580bhp
Gallardo $165K
4.9L V10 500bhp
Last edited by 1BADP71; 08-21-2004 at 09:02 AM.
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SuzukaSol
Yeah the Odessy and MDX are 3.5L, but SOHC. The NSX-R is 3.2L DOHC. The NSX engine is also lighter.
$60K + buys you double the horsepower in the Lambos. Personally, if i could afford any of them, I'd take the NSX, get Cybernation turbo kit (480whp stock internals) and laugh my way to the bank.
You can't deny that for half the horsepower and at a lower cost, the NSX hung pretty damned good.
An NSX here (non R) with every accessory is $90K.
An R in Japan would probably be $100K
3.2L V6 VTEC 280bhp
Murcielago $193-280K
6.1L V12 580bhp
Gallardo $165K
4.9L V10 500bhp
Yeah the Odessy and MDX are 3.5L, but SOHC. The NSX-R is 3.2L DOHC. The NSX engine is also lighter.
$60K + buys you double the horsepower in the Lambos. Personally, if i could afford any of them, I'd take the NSX, get Cybernation turbo kit (480whp stock internals) and laugh my way to the bank.
You can't deny that for half the horsepower and at a lower cost, the NSX hung pretty damned good.
An NSX here (non R) with every accessory is $90K.
An R in Japan would probably be $100K
3.2L V6 VTEC 280bhp
Murcielago $193-280K
6.1L V12 580bhp
Gallardo $165K
4.9L V10 500bhp
