+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread: d7000 noise example at iso6400
-
01-22-2011 05:40 PM #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 1,628
- Feedback Score
- 1 (100%)
d7000 noise example at iso6400

beforeafterd7k_iso6400 by PowersImagery.com, on Flickr
d7000
iso6400
1/160 @ 2.8
File type: Large, Normal, JPG
noise comparison.
All Noise reduction turned off
Before:
Straight out of camera,
After:
simple LR3 noise reductionJust a photographer with a bunch of NIKON glass.
My Twitter: http://twitter.com/powersimagery
My Blog: http://powersimagery.com/blog
My Website: www.powersimagery.com
My Job: Vegas Magazine | Retna LTD | Tao/Lavo/Marquee Las Vegas
-
01-22-2011 09:11 PM #2
-
01-22-2011 09:28 PM #3Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 1,628
- Feedback Score
- 1 (100%)
its very good prosumer camera that will work well in pro situations. However if you currently own a dXXX series camera and plan on using both in the field at the same time, it will get a little confusing since the controls and menus are different.
Just a photographer with a bunch of NIKON glass.
My Twitter: http://twitter.com/powersimagery
My Blog: http://powersimagery.com/blog
My Website: www.powersimagery.com
My Job: Vegas Magazine | Retna LTD | Tao/Lavo/Marquee Las Vegas
-
01-22-2011 11:06 PM #4
I def. wouldnt mind having this camera but I told myself that the next time I upgrade I'm going full frame lol

"Thirty-six satisfactory exposures on a roll means a
photographer is not trying anything new." - Freeman Patterson
-
01-23-2011 03:28 AM #5Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 1,628
- Feedback Score
- 1 (100%)
got one of those. and waiting for the d700 successor as my next main cam.
Just a photographer with a bunch of NIKON glass.
My Twitter: http://twitter.com/powersimagery
My Blog: http://powersimagery.com/blog
My Website: www.powersimagery.com
My Job: Vegas Magazine | Retna LTD | Tao/Lavo/Marquee Las Vegas
-
01-23-2011 07:30 AM #6
-
01-23-2011 12:32 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 1,628
- Feedback Score
- 1 (100%)
I don't think so. The ff sensor can't be beat.
Just a photographer with a bunch of NIKON glass.
My Twitter: http://twitter.com/powersimagery
My Blog: http://powersimagery.com/blog
My Website: www.powersimagery.com
My Job: Vegas Magazine | Retna LTD | Tao/Lavo/Marquee Las Vegas
-
01-23-2011 10:09 PM #8
-
01-24-2011 09:19 PM #9
-
02-07-2011 01:16 AM #10
rockwell did a nice write up on the d3, d7000, d300, and canon 5d
Nikon D7000, D300, D3 (D700) and Canon 5D Mark II High ISO Comparison
-
02-07-2011 05:16 AM #11Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 1,628
- Feedback Score
- 1 (100%)
rockwell is full of shit.
I own a d3 and d700, and though the d7000 is clean, its not as clean at the FX bodiesJust a photographer with a bunch of NIKON glass.
My Twitter: http://twitter.com/powersimagery
My Blog: http://powersimagery.com/blog
My Website: www.powersimagery.com
My Job: Vegas Magazine | Retna LTD | Tao/Lavo/Marquee Las Vegas
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

