+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    legend behind the cowl treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,865
    Feedback Score
    2 (75%)

    New Car, More ethanol data

    Car 1991 Volvo 940 Turbo.
    Boost Controler set for 7PSI
    Controlled Speed over varing terain and temparure.

    1100 miles so far.

    1st tamk 15 Gallons E10 87 Tampa $2.83 21.3 MPG @$2.83 $.132/mile

    2nd Tank 15 Gallons 87 Gasoline South of Savannah GA (part tank no mileage recorded but 22 is est.) @$2.66 $.12/mile

    -------------Begin ethanol recording---------------

    3rd Tank Topped off with 6.4 gallons of E85 (15 Gallopn Tank) ~35% Ethanol blend Mileage Decreased to 18.5 MPG $2.33/gal .868 yeild.

    8.6 gallons E0 @ 2.66 22.876
    6.4 Gallons E85 @ 2.33 14.912

    Cost per gallon $2.52 per gallon $.136/Mile
    -------------end---------------------------------

    35% in the tank if I follow my old Data should have yeilded 9.45% or a 2.01 reduction in MPG (2.7% reduction per 10% blend) I went from 21.3 to 18.5 which is actually a 13% reduction in mileage for a 6% cost reduction.. the 35% blend does not work unless there is almost a full dollar difference in price. and from 2.66 to 2.33 it was a net loss.

    Honestly I felt with a turbocharger the engine would be better capable of using the cooling effect and octane of enhanced ethanol blends but apparently the 20 year old computer is just not powerful enough to match my previous returns.

    test 1 Ethanol 35% FAILURE

    Net cost increase. and 3.7% decrease in mileage per 10% ethanol..

  2. #2
    legend behind the cowl treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,865
    Feedback Score
    2 (75%)
    Repeated test 4 more times with varying ethanol percentages. and got from 16-18 MPG. pretty much across the board. Not enough positive data.. but I can tell you the 1991 computer is smart enough to compensate and not pop a CEL, but it does not run as efficiently as a more powerful computerized newer car.

    In South Carolina using a 70% ethanol mix cost effective at $2.30 a gallon + $2.85 regular. even with the 4 mpg loss.

  3. #3
    Registered User SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Bradenton
    Posts
    100
    Feedback Score
    0
    Not surprising at all. The energy content of ethanol is less than gasoline. Ethanol is more knock resistant (octane).

    When doing these "tests" (the information is already out there if you just google for it) you have to keep in mind that your engine is made for gas. If you want to take advantage of the ethanol you need to make sure the car is tuned for it (ignition timing, air:fuel, compression, etc)

  4. #4
    legend behind the cowl treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller has a reputation beyond repute treekiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,865
    Feedback Score
    2 (75%)
    oh yea I've been following the buick Regal turbo that actually makes more horsepower on ethanol and the economy is similar to gas.. it's the most powerful ECU in any passenger car so i'll dig it. b

  5. #5
    Registered User SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute SixCylinders has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Bradenton
    Posts
    100
    Feedback Score
    0
    Well you can make more power on ethanol but I highly doubt that you'll make "similar" economy at the same time.

    Ethanol contains 76,000btus per gallon
    Mid-grade gasoline contains 125,000btus per gallon

    Running a similar tune will therefore (theoretically) give you 60% of the fuel economy on ethanol that it would on straight gas

    Now where ethanol retrofitting is useful is turbo cars running more than 12lbs of boost (in my opinion) because at that point (depending on the car) it's usually getting close to the limits. The conversion is not for saving money....unless E85 is $1.50 and gas is like $2.50.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204