+ Reply to Thread
Results 166 to 174 of 174
Thread: Fitment & Stance Discussion
-
01-19-2011 05:13 PM #166
-
01-19-2011 05:30 PM #167Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 9,141
- Feedback Score
- 7 (100%)
-
01-19-2011 06:10 PM #168
-
01-19-2011 06:14 PM #169Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 9,141
- Feedback Score
- 7 (100%)
-
01-20-2011 12:54 PM #170
-
01-20-2011 02:13 PM #171Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- St. Petersburg
- Posts
- 3,644
- Feedback Score
- 0
-
01-20-2011 02:41 PM #172
Been weeks since I checked out this thread.....Glad NOTHING has changed
Looking to buy or sell Real Estate, give me a call.
http://liberty-vip.com Flush ≠ VIP. Spread the word in 2012
-
01-20-2011 03:24 PM #173
1320Engineering/////
-
01-20-2011 04:06 PM #174
It's kinda like a flow chart:
A is the pro-"fitment" crowd, and B is the non-"fitment" crowd ("fitment" being used loosely, but being defined as the current acceptance of what people consider fitment)
If you don't like A --> go to B.
If you do like A --> go to B, and hate on it.
If you don't like B --> go to A.
If you do like B --> go to A, and hate on it.
It's a perpetual circle, kinda like KA vs SR, or import vs domestic, or drag vs drift. As long as it is around, it will be debated. Hilariously.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
