World's Best Sleepers (Pics)

[shinmei2006]

did you have a type S H22? or one of the other two not so 100hp per liter H22s? because i can throw up a sr20ve from a 2001+ Primera and say oh...205hp, thats just nissan doing its thing.

[1BADP71]

did you have a type S H22? or one of the other two not so 100hp per liter H22s? because i can throw up a sr20ve from a 2001+ Primera and say oh...205hp, thats just nissan doing its thing.

What I had doesn't matter , we are talking about the potential the engines had from the factory, in comparison to the shelby. even though both were built for two different reasons

But I did not sucker into a type S, I would not spend the extra money for an engine I was going to build anyways.

and your forgetting the 1.6L that nissan had which put out 170+ hp .. but still had the tq of a honda.

omnis are fun though , oddly there is one at a junkyard right now in brandon. I prefer them over the 80's chargers any day.

[1BADP71]

has this been posted yet ?




Here is a video of one modified highly to 800hp . 10 second 1/4 and 0-60 in 2.9 seconds.. looks stock to me!
http://www.hennesseyperformance.com/...ctionReq=Where

[Superluminal]

yea that's it, I have a problem with math

heres a link for the nissan guys who are in the dark..

Prelude Type S Technical Highlights

For you Honda guys in the dark....



SR16VE N1 was released in the Asian market in 1997-1998. This 1.6L I4 put out 197hp/134tq. That's 123hp per litre, more than anything Honda ever put out in a production car. Just want to reiterate what Devils stated.

Anyway... enough bullshit. Keep postin up the sleepers.

[shinmei2006]

^ that was tuned by an outside company...it wasnt stock from nissan

[fastforward]

All this bitch'n about if 13's are slow or not. Who cares...all I know is that 90% of the people on TR wish their car could pull 13's. (present company included.) In the world of drag racing, sure it's nothing to write home about, but for a D.D. 4 banger car thats still comfortable to drive everyday, it's pretty good. And for a car designed and built in 1984, I'd say that's damn good. Considering most smog-ridden rides from back then were happy to pull under 20 sec.

Anyway...enough of that crap....more pics.
I don't know what's under the hood here, but it looks pretty sweet for a Pacer.
Maybe not exactly a sleeper....as it does look fast for an old fugly AMC.

[Superluminal]

All this bitch'n about if 13's are slow or not. Who cares...all I know is that 90% of the people on TR wish their car could pull 13's. (present company included.) In the world of drag racing, sure it's nothing to write home about, but for a D.D. 4 banger car thats still comfortable to drive everyday, it's pretty good. And for a car designed and built in 1984, I'd say that's damn good. Considering most smog-ridden rides from back then were happy to pull under 20 sec.

Anyway...enough of that crap....more pics.
I don't know what's under the hood here, but it looks pretty sweet for a Pacer.
Maybe not exactly a sleeper....as it does look fast for an old fugly AMC.

That is fucking awesome.

[1BADP71]

here is my uncles 401 gremlin, complete restore.

Too bad he got beat by the 65 mustang he built for my late aunt .

Lansing Gremlins

[Superluminal]

4G63 Mirage

YouTube - Lancer Evolution Vs. 1989 Mirage Turbo Sleeper

Galant VR4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeUtf...eature=related

[Superluminal]

This guys car:

LS7X Procharged GTO retaining IRS.

9.19@151.05mph

2005 Pontiac GTO 1/4 mile trap speeds 0-60 - DragTimes.com

[BGRIF]

A srt8 Jeep GC is deff a sleeper , a suv that rapes about every car off the line and a few simple mods and there nasty.

[1BADP71]

A srt8 Jeep GC is deff a sleeper , a suv that rapes about every car off the line and a few simple mods and there nasty.

That's what I posted up mid page..

a 10 second jeep cherokee.

they are monsters stock even .

[Prowlin_Pasco]

What I had doesn't matter , we are talking about the potential the engines had from the factory, in comparison to the shelby. even though both were built for two different reasons

But I did not sucker into a type S, I would not spend the extra money for an engine I was going to build anyways.

and your forgetting the 1.6L that nissan had which put out 170+ hp .. but still had the tq of a honda.

omnis are fun though , oddly there is one at a junkyard right now in brandon. I prefer them over the 80's chargers any day.

The 2.2/2.5 Dodge turbo motors are great. I worked with a guy who bought a very clean n. omni and a rusted up GLH. He swapped the motor, brakes and suspension from the GLH into the good car. Ran 3 inch exhaust, ported the head, intercooler, etc. He ended up selling it before it was full broken in, so he never actually got to time it.

[FoxHondaRider]

Nissan Patrol lol

[BGRIF]

That's what I posted up mid page..

a 10 second jeep cherokee.

they are monsters stock even .

ha sorry man , didnt see it. yeah there nasty , that's probably my next vehicle.