Fitment & Stance Pictures

[HUGHJASS]

Oh yea, and surprise, this car is "functional".

[Eric]

so whats with all the fags in this thread getting all bent out of shape over some ones opinion? I don't like and you do....who cares right? I'm not trying to get you to change your mind about them. I have to stay out of this thread because I don't like the look of some of the cars in it? I think not....There are tons of cars posted that look great and it's not just the domestics

[IThaJokaI]

so whats with all the fags in this thread getting all bent out of shape over some ones opinion? I don't like and you do....who cares right? I'm not trying to get you to change your mind about them. I have to stay out of this thread because I don't like the look of some of the cars in it? I think not....There are tons of cars posted that look great and it's not just the domestics

No body said stay out moron. Everyone said to "shut the fuck up, and keep it to yourself." As for The people complaining being fags, your the bitch complaining about someone elses car not being to your liking... who gives a flying fuck?

[Eric]

THIS THREAD HAS BEEN NOTHING BUT OPINIONS...Just like people have said they like some of the cars a few of us said we don't. mine is different from yours and i'll express it if I feel the need...sooooo deal with it or keep telling me to "STFU" none of that is bothering me at all

[JonLGT]

THIS THREAD HAS BEEN NOTHING BUT OPINIONS

You mean mostly opinions, fact is that much negetive camber is not good for high speeds, traction, handling, or normal commuting. It looks cool but is totally for show to have THAT MUCH camber, especiall on the front 2 wheels on a FWD.

[Eric]

You mean mostly opinions, fact is that much negetive camber is not good for high speeds, traction, handling, or normal commuting. It looks cool but is totally for show to have THAT MUCH camber, especiall on the front 2 wheels on a FWD.

...ok, mostly opinions.

[DEATH ZEPPELIN]

i like this fitment and stance.






maybe im crazy but cars that you can put to use are more fun

[.Seth.]

^i agree

[HellofaPrzeFghtr]

^^ That is not stance or fitment. Sorry.

I like a few of those pictures. Some nice cars.
But that isnt what we are trying to discuss.

We are trying to discuss fitting your rim/wheel/tire/spinner to your car.

[.Seth.]

^^ That is not stance or fitment. Sorry.

I like a few of those pictures. Some nice cars.
But that isnt what we are trying to discuss.

We are trying to discuss fitting your rim/wheel/tire/spinner to your car.

how is the first pic no of stance and fitment???

stance from behind looks mean as hell and it actualy fits in the wheel well!

[HellofaPrzeFghtr]

the first and second are, but not all the cars off of the ground, which led me to believe you didnt understand the topic.

[.Seth.]

no i understand the topic lol

[John]

So how does it ride/traction in a straight line?

Why dont they come from the factory like that?

Well alignment is always a compromise. More negative camber is good for handling, steady state turns (G forces) but excess can make the car slow or twitchy to react on switch backs (slaloms). For grip off the line, RWD cars won't notice much loss in straight line traction, due to the weight transfer. For ride quality, it can make some difference, but its hard to quantify with numbers. It can make for less wet traction for sure, likely the biggest reason you don't see this from the factory.

[markzeronine]

Oh yea, and surprise, this car is "functional".

so you're telling me this would perform better than say, 15x8's with sticky, thicker, wider tires?

not trying to pick a fight, just seeing if some of you guys understand my side of the argument.

[Eric]

so you're telling me this would perform better than say, 15x8's with sticky, thicker, wider tires?

not trying to pick a fight, just seeing if some of you guys understand my side of the argument.

lol...i'm thinking it might, maybe i'm just some dumb ricer though?