horsepower on a GT40P motor??????
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S.Y.L.O.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's what I gave him moments before your excellent post... 
Then he asked about a regular 'ol 302...
From my faulty Wiki link...
"In 1987, the Mustang received E7 heads and a more capable intake manifold. Power ratings jumped to 225 horsepower and 300 ft·lbf torque. In 1989, the Mustang's speed density air system was replaced with a mass air system. This change slightly reduced factory horsepower but it also made Mustangs much easier to modify. With the new mass air system, changes made to the intake, engine, and exhaust system would be recognized and compensated for by the ECU, resulting in a correct air/fuel ratio and optimum power. In 1993, Ford switched to cast hypereutectic pistons in all 5.0s, and also re-rated the GT at 205 horsepower and 275 ft·lbf torque"
Then he asked about a regular 'ol 302...
From my faulty Wiki link...
"In 1987, the Mustang received E7 heads and a more capable intake manifold. Power ratings jumped to 225 horsepower and 300 ft·lbf torque. In 1989, the Mustang's speed density air system was replaced with a mass air system. This change slightly reduced factory horsepower but it also made Mustangs much easier to modify. With the new mass air system, changes made to the intake, engine, and exhaust system would be recognized and compensated for by the ECU, resulting in a correct air/fuel ratio and optimum power. In 1993, Ford switched to cast hypereutectic pistons in all 5.0s, and also re-rated the GT at 205 horsepower and 275 ft·lbf torque"
S.Y.L.O.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
damn...I'm slow tonight.
That's what I gave him moments before your excellent post...
Then he asked about a regular 'ol 302...
From my faulty Wiki link...
"In 1987, the Mustang received E7 heads and a more capable intake manifold. Power ratings jumped to 225 horsepower and 300 ft·lbf torque. In 1989, the Mustang's speed density air system was replaced with a mass air system. This change slightly reduced factory horsepower but it also made Mustangs much easier to modify. With the new mass air system, changes made to the intake, engine, and exhaust system would be recognized and compensated for by the ECU, resulting in a correct air/fuel ratio and optimum power. In 1993, Ford switched to cast hypereutectic pistons in all 5.0s, and also re-rated the GT at 205 horsepower and 275 ft·lbf torque"
Then he asked about a regular 'ol 302...
From my faulty Wiki link...
"In 1987, the Mustang received E7 heads and a more capable intake manifold. Power ratings jumped to 225 horsepower and 300 ft·lbf torque. In 1989, the Mustang's speed density air system was replaced with a mass air system. This change slightly reduced factory horsepower but it also made Mustangs much easier to modify. With the new mass air system, changes made to the intake, engine, and exhaust system would be recognized and compensated for by the ECU, resulting in a correct air/fuel ratio and optimum power. In 1993, Ford switched to cast hypereutectic pistons in all 5.0s, and also re-rated the GT at 205 horsepower and 275 ft·lbf torque"
lives in a glass house
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
