The Ford Forum Lounge Off Topic Group for Ford Forum Members or other regulars. Keep it work safe please. No tech posts.

500 Horsepower NA Setup??? Help

Old 05-01-2010, 12:09 PM
  #31 (permalink)  
Still CREEPIN
 
Stealth Mode's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Holy shit! I havn't seen negative rep in forever!
__________________

TurboRAM Member #5
24psi & Stable
GET SOME

Old 05-01-2010, 12:18 PM
  #32 (permalink)  
Still CREEPIN
 
Stealth Mode's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BuickStangdude
...were you saying that that 408/427 setups you referred that to, should of been putting out more power?

Alot more... Someone on here is a hair short of that 500whp, NA, with a 9.5" deck block.


Damn all those magically setups
__________________

TurboRAM Member #5
24psi & Stable
GET SOME

Old 05-01-2010, 01:25 PM
  #33 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
Hurstmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 10sec306
I don't see how a 351 is easier, with a heavier rotating assembly, bigger mains, and also the added weight of the block.

To the OP, if you keep it N/A do an early model block, keep the ratating assembly fairly light. Put the heads you have in the hands of the right person, an off the shelf hydraulic roller, change the intake. Keep it out of detonation, don't spin it to the moon and it will live and make 500whp.

With a HP goal of 500hp I'll take the larger (stronger) mains, the heavier (stronger again) rotating assembly and heavier (yes stronger) block over the 302 block any day of the week. The 302 will need to spin to the moon to make 500hp NA. 15 yrs ago my father inlaws 327 (Chevy) spun 9000 to make an honest 500hp NA. I had a nice 306 combo in my 93 with AFR 185 heads and its hard enough to make 400hp out of them. The only way I could see another 100hp would be using a race only cam and spinning another 2000 RPM. And even then,.. a 306 wont have the torque the 351 will. 408 - 427 will make 500hp NA easier than a 306 will and probably for a lot less money. How long will a 302 block live at 500hp NA spinning those kinds of RPM's?

There are guys using stock 351 rotating assemblies making 600 - 650hp. Thats not going to happen with a 302 based engine.

Hurst
__________________


Originally Posted by Tiffiny
"We all heart the Hurst"

Last edited by Hurstmeister; 05-01-2010 at 01:27 PM.
Old 05-01-2010, 01:37 PM
  #34 (permalink)  
I gota Cheby
 
Zman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would have to agree cubic inches is always easier. another car I had, like hers, 69 Camaro 400 SBC NA, street tires thru exhaust, 10's. Back in 88-89. 500 hp, nope more around lil over 400 If your trying to be like her then you dont need 500 ponies now if its just a magic number you want then thats different.
__________________

Only 1/4 mile track I know is Gandy Bridge
Old 05-01-2010, 01:40 PM
  #35 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
slow306stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i've been through 2 season on a stock block 306 spinning 7800-8000rpm's i don't know exact hp on the engine but its been 10.90 at 122mph.
__________________
daily
1988 fiero gt, stock and slow
race car
1989 mustang lx, n/a 8.2 deck 302 block, just your average street car.
project
1973 plymouth 340 'cuda
Old 05-01-2010, 06:59 PM
  #36 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
Hurstmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow306stang
i've been through 2 season on a stock block 306 spinning 7800-8000rpm's i don't know exact hp on the engine but its been 10.90 at 122mph.

You only need 400 - 425hp to trap 122 mph in a 3000 - 3200lb car.

And would you honestly call a motor making power at 8000 RPM a 'streetable' combo? A 351 block using a cheap $1500 408ci rotating assembly with mediocre heads and an F cam will make 380 - 400 HP and over 400ft/lb torq.

Not putting your combo down. 122mph out of a 306 is pretty damn stout. Mine only trapped 110/112 with a 3600lb race weight. But to deny the cubic inch rule of thumb is like the ricers falling back on the whole hp per liter BS.


Hurst
__________________


Originally Posted by Tiffiny
"We all heart the Hurst"
Old 05-01-2010, 08:16 PM
  #37 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
10sec306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All I know is you don't need 400C.I. to make 500hp, Hurst I agree with alot you say on these boards but not on this. I have been 132mph with junk (and was more in it), drove the car all over for a year and a half, and you're saying with 40 more C.I. that it can't be done? The fact is most people put a combo together and if it don't run what they want they build something bigger, because it's the easy way to go instead of figuring out how to go fast with something smaller, and it's alot more impressive when they do, IMO.
__________________
THE STICK SHIFT MAFIA Pump gas N/A 349 on some 26x10's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiXjW...ature=youtu.be
Old 05-01-2010, 08:24 PM
  #38 (permalink)  
Bondsman
 
GNs-r-slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^^ is building a bigger motor!! JFWY Amp
Old 05-01-2010, 08:33 PM
  #39 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
10sec306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, but it will be under 347 CI, and if it don't make 500hp on pump gas I will burn it to the ground!!!!
__________________
THE STICK SHIFT MAFIA Pump gas N/A 349 on some 26x10's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiXjW...ature=youtu.be
Old 05-01-2010, 08:36 PM
  #40 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
Hurstmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 10sec306
All I know is you don't need 400C.I. to make 500hp, Hurst I agree with alot you say on these boards but not on this. I have been 132mph with junk (and was more in it), drove the car all over for a year and a half, and you're saying with 40 more C.I. that it can't be done? The fact is most people put a combo together and if it don't run what they want they build something bigger, because it's the easy way to go instead of figuring out how to go fast with something smaller, and it's alot more impressive when they do, IMO.

I never said it cant be done. Where did I say that?

I only said its not as easy as it appears using the other 2 guys as a basis.

Hurst
__________________


Originally Posted by Tiffiny
"We all heart the Hurst"


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 AM.