18.gif
Forums Register TRHelp TRGarage TRader Ratings Classifieds Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar
iTrader Mainpage
Browse All Members
FAQ Gallery Weather Log Out
 

Go Back   Tampa Racing > Motorsports & General Tech > Auto-X/Road Racing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2003, 10:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
i stepped on my weiner!

Car: 93 turbo Si
 
 
Alabama sucks teh fat one
NChatch has a spectacular aura about: 173804
camber kit question

anyone here know of a good and easy to use camber kit for a 92-95 civic, i am looking for the one that replace the top of the shock tower and slide in and out, like they have for the mustangs, i just dont know who makes it......or can anyone on here machine me some??

i really would like to be bale to run negative camber on the next road coarse..... street alignments suck ass.


NChatch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2003, 10:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
cone junkie

Car: 1993 MR2
 
 
Gainesville, FL
PseudoRealityX is an unknown quantity at this point: 210
you have a honda....they don't make "camber plates", which is what you described for Double Wishbone suspensions.

you have to look at control arms...aka, like the skunk 2 units.


PseudoRealityX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2003, 07:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
i stepped on my weiner!

Car: 93 turbo Si
 
 
Alabama sucks teh fat one
NChatch has a spectacular aura about: 173804
actually jesse they do make camber plates for our cars, just like the cobras, you drill the top of the shock tower out and bolt in the plates, i have seen them, i just dont want to be flipping the camber plates on the control arm everytime i race cause you actually have to remove them to do so, i probably should have posted this in the honda section.....my bust



you had some nice runs in g-ville on saturday......i didnt!!!!!


NChatch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2003, 11:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
cone junkie

Car: 1993 MR2
 
 
Gainesville, FL
PseudoRealityX is an unknown quantity at this point: 210
They make plates for the older 3rd gen platforms, but not the later cars. EVERY single STS/DSP Integra/Civic has the same issue.

Cusco makes an "upper bearing" for increased camber, but not your typical camber plate you'll see on Mac Strut cars. Also, if you have to actually drill out the little hole at the top of the shock tower, you're moving to a full Prepared class, as even street mod doesn't allow that....if you care.

If you can show me a picture/link of what you're thinking of, it might help.


PseudoRealityX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 01:28 AM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator

Car: 2007 Toyota Yaris LB . . . 1976 Triumph Spitfire
 
 
Safety Harbor
Loren has a reputation beyond repute: 65156010
Not a Honda guy, but...

Isn't there some trick where you can use a lower control arm from an Integra which is slightly longer, but otherwise identical, to gain some negative camber?

Be sure to check the rules of whatever class you might want to be legal for if applicable.


Loren is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 10:51 AM   #6 (permalink)
Livin' in Seattle

Car: '05 Subaru STi (black)
 
 
Seattle Washington
Bill has  hit bottom,  and can only go up!: 1078700
Quote:
Originally posted by Loren
Not a Honda guy, but...

Isn't there some trick where you can use a lower control arm from an Integra which is slightly longer, but otherwise identical, to gain some negative camber?

Be sure to check the rules of whatever class you might want to be legal for if applicable.
You can switch upper control arms from side to side to gain a bit of caster.

Anyways, I don't see the issue here. Just grab a set of Skunk2 type upper arms and a set of adjustable heim joints for the rear. No need to go for some off-the-wall solution, this'll work just fine.


Bill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 01:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Guest

Car:
 
0HP930 is an unknown quantity at this point: 0
You might have an easier time finding an answer to this question on the honda tech board.


0HP930 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2003, 04:02 PM   #8 (permalink)
TRs Iron Chef & Party God

Car:
 
 
tampa, FL
BodyRollin' is an unknown quantity at this point: 158
i have skunk 2 in the front and engalls kit in the rear, in hind sight i wish i would have used ingalls in the front too because they offer caster adjustments, as well as camber adjustments, skunk 2 is camber only. however the skunk 2 is obviously the easier of the 2 to install.


BodyRollin' is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2003, 04:17 PM   #9 (permalink)
Livin' in Seattle

Car: '05 Subaru STi (black)
 
 
Seattle Washington
Bill has  hit bottom,  and can only go up!: 1078700
Quote:
Originally posted by BodyRollin'
i have skunk 2 in the front and engalls kit in the rear, in hind sight i wish i would have used ingalls in the front too because they offer caster adjustments, as well as camber adjustments, skunk 2 is camber only. however the skunk 2 is obviously the easier of the 2 to install.
How are they regarding adjustment? Simpler or more difficult?


Bill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2003, 08:04 PM   #10 (permalink)
cone junkie

Car: 1993 MR2
 
 
Gainesville, FL
PseudoRealityX is an unknown quantity at this point: 210
Quote:
Originally posted by BodyRollin'
i have skunk 2 in the front and engalls kit in the rear, in hind sight i wish i would have used ingalls in the front too because they offer caster adjustments, as well as camber adjustments, skunk 2 is camber only. however the skunk 2 is obviously the easier of the 2 to install.
caster adjustment is illegal, by the rules of STS.....just FYI....but technically, you're in SM.


PseudoRealityX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright 2005 Tampa Forums Corporation
Message Boards and Forums Directory