So, my Civic should be in E Prepared?

[w0rd]

http://www.sccaforums.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/5/1075

Kind of sucks since that brace probably has zero performance benefits. Especially when you consider that a tie bar is legal and subframe reinforcements are legal(?), but when you combine the two, they magically become illegal.

[mofugga]

cheater :wtf:

has it always been illegal or is this a new rule?

[w0rd]

It's in italics, so I think that means it's new for this year.
I will be racing against Leonard when I bump to AP.
I think this might hurt my pax results from now on.

The SP rule is not in italics, so I guess these have always been illegal in DSP.

[Leonard]

I will be racing against Leonard when I bump to AP.
I think this might hurt my pax results from now on.


Your raw times were better than mine. Why you complaining?

[mofugga]

keep it in sts, i won't complain & don't think anyone else will either. it's only local stuff ;-)

[mrf582]

keep it in sts, i won't complain & don't think anyone else will either. it's only local stuff ;-)

agreed. i don't want to sit there at the end of the day and bust out my calculator to figure out how you would've done in STS pax wise.

[w0rd]

I like this guys definition...
What you have done is removed the stock swaybar, added a strut brace, then mounted an aftermarket swaybar using a legal method of attachment.
Sounds good to me, I'm back in STS. :headbang:

[mofugga]

I like this guys definition...

Sounds good to me, I'm back in STS. :headbang:
until i protest you :dbird:

[jaball77]

http://www.sccaforums.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/5/1075

Kind of sucks since that brace probably has zero performance benefits. Especially when you consider that a tie bar is legal and subframe reinforcements are legal(?), but when you combine the two, they magically become illegal.

Do you have a hacksaw?

:-D