Stroker 2???

[Derek]

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid99/p27e77af5dae41f75bd57820dea828f8b/f9fab7fe.jpg

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid99/p471d894f714624bfbf893a98ce23b9e8/f9fab7ff.jpg

Dont know if i like it or not.....

The bubble it has is different wonder what it does? More cone area?

[93ex]

Maybe its a protective cover? that surround is hot tho

[eli]

wow new to me, never seen those before. they any good?

[stockls 15.4??what]

damn!!!! that looks like a killer speaker...i wouldn't mind hearing one of those or maybe 4 of them haha

[MDIFYTD]

Strokers in the past were basically DBdrag only type subs. I can't imagine they would sound very good.

[TBSpyder]

From what I've heard, CV originally made those for sq...so you would think they should sound pretty nice. But yeah, those are some of the best out there..I've seen single sub setups in excess of 150dBs. They can handle like 3000w RMS too....

[Kirk]

Damn.. thats a little too crazy for me

[Bumpin Expo]

speaking of all this stroking, what some good porn to download off kazaa. I cant find nething nemore i ran out

[Derek]

again clearly....

Someone on another forums said the buble was to make it more rigid? Something about the second spider being not rigid enough? But i dont know, it was the same thing in the original stroker

[MANOFSTEEL]

that sub looks werid wally.
i dont know if it can hit harder than my solo-barics.

[Derek]

lmao @ sal

[stockls 15.4??what]

i love solo-barics to death and think they are one of the best speakers but that stroker looks pretty serious

[TBSpyder]

Originally posted by MANOFSTEEL
that sub looks werid wally.
i dont know if it can hit harder than my solo-barics.

A stroker would destroy a L7.;)

[Bumpin Expo]

lol, uh oh sal someones doubting ur solobarics

[stockls 15.4??what]

solo-barics are the shit but that stroker will annihilate it

[stangerang]

that setup cut's down on cone surface area, it would give it more excursion.........


as far as CV's and kickers, leave em and get some JL's.........

[Bumpin Expo]

yay another jl whore

[93ex]

Originally posted by stangerang
that setup cut's down on cone surface area, it would give it more excursion.........


as far as CV's and kickers, leave em and get some JL's.........

a dome cuts down on surface area? this is new

[Derek]

Was wondering the same thing. Would think it would be more. Plus why would cutting down surface area be a good thing ne ways.

[Derek]

Originally posted by Afboy143
yay another jl whore

Nothing wrong with JL just really over priced.

[93ex]

Originally posted by Derek123
Was wondering the same thing. Would think it would be more. Plus why would cutting down surface area be a good thing ne ways.

that was my understanding... more surface area = more air the cone can come in contact with to move...

[MDIFYTD]

It's all about the swept volume

[stangerang]

you DO want more surface area, putting a larger surround cuts away from the cone area.........


thus less air moved unless you make it on the flip side with more excursion........

[stangerang]

oh shit, ya know what, i didnt even notice the dome, i was just talking about the really huge surrounds.........


i dunno WTF the dome is good for........ maybe it creates some type of pressure balance or something........

[93ex]

Originally posted by stangerang
oh shit, ya know what, i didnt even notice the dome, i was just talking about the really huge surrounds.........


i dunno WTF the dome is good for........ maybe it creates some type of pressure balance or something........

im betting the dome is still just there for protection..

and the surround looks to allow for some nice excursion

[TBSpyder]

Originally posted by stangerang
you DO want more surface area, putting a larger surround cuts away from the cone area.........


thus less air moved unless you make it on the flip side with more excursion........


More excursion, means more air moving. And surface area is surface area...doesn't matter if it's made up by the cone or surround.